The Most Single Parents are Mothers - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1933 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/07/01 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Single Parent Essay Did you like this example? According to the Single Parent Center, most single parents are mothers. Single fathers make up 2.5% of the single parent homes. The United States has about 14 million single parents. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Most Single Parents are Mothers" essay for you Create order My twin sister and I only know life as siblings with a single mom who loves us. I come from a large family who has supported us since birth (Single Mother Grants). I would have loved to have had a two-parent home but that did not happen. My parents were 18 when they werent ready to be parents like so many teenagers who find themselves pregnant. My sister and I know, firsthand, the ups and downs of living in a single-parent home. Though our dad acknowledges us, our mom has to be two parents in one. Growing up in a single-parent home comes with lots of stress and benefits. Jennifer Wolf, in her article for the Very Well Family, talks about the misconceptions of single parenting. Some misconceptions are that single moms with children chose to be single mothers, they chose not to work and would rather receive public assistance (Wolf, n.d). My mom is a hard-working mother who has worked hard to provide for her children. From the moment that my mom found out that she was having twins, Ive been told how her life changed after that moment. My mom was a high school graduate and college-bound, but those plans were put on hold. My grandparents wanted all of their children to go to some type of college or university of their choice. My family members were heartbroken over the news but were determined to help mom deal with it. My mother wanted a two-parent environment for us but that never was never achieved. She had to learn that she could only do so much. With being born three months early, my mom found her with two preemie babies, my sister and me, who spent almost two months in the hospitals intensive care unit before coming home. We were high-risk infants with lots of medical problems and issues. My mom had no support from our father, no job, no income, and no medical insurance. The cost of having a baby is very expensive. Our birth cost over $20,000, in 1998, which didnt include our after-career (Corry, 2019). My sister and I spent weeks in the intensive care unit for babies and mom visited us daily. My dad visited occasionally. This only way for our dad to see us was in a form of a 45- minute drive. Mom had to worry and stress over not having one sick baby but two. She missed having that other parent for support and decision making. Single parents and their children can become dependents of public assistance and it seems like an easy option. My grandfather had family coverage insurance which covered my moms medical expenses. This was a needed benefit. Moms expectation was to receive support from our dad but that didnt happen. My grandparents did a lot to make sure that we had everything that we needed. Family support is very important during a time like this. We needed two of everything and had it. Single parents need so much support and because teen pregnancies arent planned, most times, neither parent knows what to do. The news of an unexpected birth is devastating when a teen has college plans after graduating from high school. This time can be so stressful for the parents-to-be, the grandparents and siblings of the expecting teens. Once we were home, there were lots of doctor visits, home visits from therapists, and other outside help and family supporters. All of these things were good for our mother and for us. Mom couldnt work but received income for having sick babies. This benefit continued until we reached junior high school. Before, long, dad was forced to pay child support. He wasnt very happy. By then, he was married and soon finished college. Our contact with him wasnt much during our first years of life. This rejection affected mom, making her really angry. Her anger and disappointment negatively, affect my sister and me. Our grandparents hated the negative interaction with our parents and worked to not pick sides. Caring for her children wasnt a choice for our mom. If she needed to go anywhere, she needed a babysitter. She also had to watch how she spent money. Once she moved out of my grandparents home, there were bills. Luxuries were very limited. She could only afford those things that were necessary. As we got older, we realized just how much she cried about her situation. She loved us and she saw the hurtfulness that we felt because of the bad relationship with our dad. We would reach out to him only to be disappointed. Children who are raised in a single-parent home are forced to go through life missing out on what its like to have both parents present in their lives. Family support is very important for single parents. My grandparents supported us in every way possible. Sometimes, there were school or other activities that included the absent parent but for my sister and me, we had uncles and a grandfather who filled in. Our school sponsored a program where you could have donuts with your dad. There were lots of kids at our school who were raised by single parents just like my sister and I. Our grandfather attended the breakfast with us. We were also a part of a cotillion that included a formal ball. Our uncles rented tuxedoes and chaperoned us. We badly, wanted our dad to see us all dressed up in formal gowns but it meant so much for our uncles to step in and support us. Our grandparents made sure that we had instruments to play in the school band, go on all field trips and play sports. Eve ntually, mom wanted to find a job and attend college. Mom tried both, while we were young but because of our doctors visits that were sometimes, 45 miles away, her wishes didnt last. We were admitted to the hospital sometimes due to illnesses related to being preemie babies. Mom chose to be a mom and take care of her responsibilities. She unselfishly put her plans on hold for us. She began taking a few college courses but had to stop for the same reason. It was hard trying to study at home. After taking care of her daily routine, she was too tired to keep up on her studies. She soon landed a job as a daycare worker at the YMCA. This was a blessing. My sister and I got to attend for free so mom wasnt charged for daycare. She was able to keep this job for several years. Once we began school, things were a lot easier for us. Once we were older, mom talked to us about our dad. There were times when she let go of her anger and he made a few visits. There was never court ordered visits so dad never showed a big interest in spending time with us. In some families, parental visits can become an ugly issue. Dad got married and his wife appeared to have a hard time with visits. Visiting didnt last but our pain and longing to be a part of his life did. In the meantime, life continued as mom was determined to go back to college. Adults attending college are, sometimes, better students than traditional students. Mom was another parent who dispelled the myth that a parent cant balance a job and family and return to college. My sister and I were good students because mom instilled in us, the values of having an education and being good citizens. Down through the years, her training of how to care for the house and ourselves paid off. She received an associates degree and went on to work on her Bachelors degree. She is just a few classes shy. FamilyDoctor.org in their Jan. 18, 2018 article states that single parenting is a challenge. I, totally, agree. The article suggests that parents should be active, have fun, use resources and make time for yourself (Staff, 2019). My mom did all of these things. She has wounds that healed and our family is proud of us. I have learned some good lessons and I still love both my parents very much. According to the, YOU MAY ASK YOURSELF: An introduction to thinking like a sociologist by Dalton Conley, the 3 theories that bring understanding to the idea of living in a single-parent environment are functionalism, symbolic interaction, and conflict theory. The textbook defines functionalism that various social institution and processes in society exist to serve some important function to keep society running (Conley, 2019). In other words, with living in a single-parent environment, that child has to other things in their life that keeps their mind of off it like relatives, church, going to school, where they live and the economics. I agree with because me coming a single-parent home, I have components mentioned above have kept me busy and really did not feel bad about just have one parent to support me but I have my family, church family and schoolmates that also support me in the processes. The other theory is symbolic interaction with from the text states is a micro- level theo ry in which shared meanings, orientations, and assumptions form the basic motivations behind peoples actions(Conley,2019). This definition makes it clear that in order to have family they, especially for two people get together have children together, does not mean they have to be married. You can have a family without saying I do. I also agree with this, my mom told me that she and my father were supposed to get married, but it never happened and do not know why. Instead, he went to college and married someone else and had another child. A lot times as a kid, I often talked about my parents and I was always questioned if my parents were together or married as if that was the norm to have a kid. The last theory is conflict, which the textbook informs that it is the idea conflict between competing interests is the basic, animating force of social change and society in general (Conley, 2019). Like I said before being married and having a family does not have the same meaning either d o they correlate with each other. For this these two ideas to bring forth what they are about, it is the environment and people that make up these concepts. As far as a family I feel, especially coming from a single parent home, you just need really great people in your life to support you and your achievements. People like grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins etc and places like being a part of extracurricular activities as church and school can help build a better environment for a family. I just that type of environment around to build a family that supports and loves me. Coming from single-parent home has its pros and cons. It is not too bad because you literally have the attention of that one parent. Just having my mom in my life as my parent, she has done anything and everything from my sister and me to have a better life and make it feel as if we were missing out on anything as if we felt we were living in a two-parent home. Living in a single parent environment is nothing to be ashamed of and only means you have a lot more support you need from the people around you.

Google, Apple and Semco Essay - 1345 Words

Three articles, three companies and three very different managing styles. The articles look at how three very important people keep a handle on their employees. Steve Jobs co-founder of Apple and his non-text book approach to an autocratic managing style, CEO of Google Eric Schmit and his laissez-faire catastrophe and Ricardo Semler CEO of SEMCO and his participative ways that surprisingly seem to be working. All run in different markets and have created their own rules to follow. They are the companies paving the way and demonstrating how to be successful in traditional ways but with their own twist. Sometimes they may not seem like the most efficient ways to get your workers to be productive, but in these astounding cases they seem to be†¦show more content†¦Each company has its own way of nabbing the spotlight from competitors. Apple is intensely secretive about its products, so secretive that not even the workers know what they are working on. This gives Apple a leg up o n competitors, when they came up with the iPhone design nobody knew what they were up to, and then it took other companies trying to steal apples spot light longer to come up with a product similar. Apple is not like every other company in the same market, like Microsoft, instead they stepped out of the norm. Everything is created in house and while some products work with others like iPods and PC, they will work best with apple products. This creates customer loyalties: if someone buys a Mac is most likely going to buy an iPhone or an iPod. It is unlike any other computer company. Microsoft for example has to get other companies to create hardware or software to be compatible with its products. Apple operates within its self, making it the firm to beat. Google is still going strong, but growth has been decreasing instead of increasing. With the amount of employees they turn over, they have to hire back. There has to be a high amount of training with the numbers of workers they loos e on a monthly or even weekly basis. Google still has something going for them, and that is the amount of programs they run. , just to name a few: Gmail, Google apps, Google maps,Show MoreRelatedManagement Styles1872 Words   |  8 PagesStyles of Apple, Google, and SEMCO There are some businesses in the world that stand out more then others due to their success and ability to stay relevant in  their sectors. Three such companies, Apple, Google and Semco are like the all-star team  of corporations that command respect at the mention of their names. The reasons for their success are  illustrated in the business articles â€Å"Managing Without Managers,† â€Å"How Apple Got Everything Right by doing Everything Wrong,† and â€Å"Where does Google go fromRead MoreCompare Democratic and Autocratic Leadership1302 Words   |  6 Pagesconcerns. Companies in flat organizational structure with â€Å"a wide span of control and a chain of command,† (Nicholas, 2009, p.325) can better guarantee the right of followers through face-to-face or indirect interaction. Ricardo Semler (1989), CEO of SEMCO, a manufacturing company in Brazil which advocates democratic leadership style and adopts flat organizational structure, agrees that workers should be treated as competent and trustworthy adults and should be offered freedom to question and express

Change in Male Role in the Home 1960-Present Free Essays

Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present Traditionally the United States, along with the majority of the world has been a patriarchal society. The customary male role, specifically in relation to the home, has been the head of the household, the protector, and the provider. A male’s duty was unquestionably embodied in these three ideas, until the 1970’s. We will write a custom essay sample on Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present or any similar topic only for you Order Now The growing feminist movement of that time began to question and displace these roles as solely belonging to a man, and the male role in society slowly began to shift. Instead of being the sole breadwinner for his home, families with two working parents have become increasingly more common. Women in the workforce have allowed father’s to spend more time at home with their children and helping out around the house. Over the last 50 years the male role has changed drastically, and while not all of the changes that have taken place are bad, the overall effect of these changes on society has been a negative one, creating a generation of fatherlessness, increased crime, and a general lack of respect for authority in any form. For generations it has been a man’s responsibility to provide for his family. Women were rarely even accepted into the workforce until after WWII. However, government encouragement for women to enter the labor force during the war, in combination with the rising feminist movement started a tidal wave movement of women pursuing higher education and careers. Women currently make up the majority of the workforce and 60% of all college graduates (Rosin). Donnalyn Pompper, a professor at Temple University, expands on this further in her article about the masculine gender role conflict theory. She explains that that after WWII, the increased female presence in the labor force â€Å"destabilized the breadwinner role as a basis for male identity, and now men must accept working wives and a more active parental role† (Pompper). And while it is true that the shift to equal opportunity in the workforce is almost universally agreed upon as a positive change, the balance and delicateness of the male psyche and ego are seldom taken into consideration. For many men, the ability to provide for one’s family is an integral part of the definition of masculinity. In interviews conducted by Dr. Pompper, when asked to individually define masculinity, a reoccurring theme in both the younger and older men interviewed was the ability to provide for one’s family. One of the young men interviewed said, â€Å"Being masculine means you are able to look at your wife and say ‘I got this’. To be able to look at your kids and say ‘I’ve got you’. That to me is the epitome of masculinity†¦being able, at the end of the day, to look at your family and say, ‘get on my back, I’ve got you the rest of the way’. Another man expressed similar feelings and said, â€Å"I think that every guy feels like it’s his place not to be the stay home Dad† (Pompper). Even in today’s forward thinking society, men are wired to be the provider. To take that role completely away is emasculating to him and leaves him feeling like he is unnecessary in the home. Although a family where, either both parents, or just the mother provide financially may be a little tough on the male ego, it is not detrimental. Provider is not the only established male role, protector and ‘head of the house’ are equally important to the equation. The traditional man of the 1960’s was indisputably the head of his home. There was a clear hierarchy, and while the husband and wife still often worked as a team, the culture of the time dictated that a man was undeniably in charge of his home, and his family. In many ways, this has been one of the most distinct changes between the 1960’s and 2012. Because men are no longer the sole breadwinner for their home, they are required to spend a larger portion of their time taking an active role in the home. No longer is the kitchen and house exclusively a woman’s domain, but rather shared by both parties. Men are expected to help out around the house and with the children, as much as women are. The idea of â€Å"team parenting† has evolved and taken root in today’s society, and has had excellent outcomes. Research has shown that children who are raised by two parents (a mother and a father specifically) have greater cognitive ability and success rates than children whose fathers are absent or uninvolved (Hofferth). This style of parents working together as a team to raise their children has been a great strategy, but looking at the big picture, it is shown that â€Å"Team parenting† has also unknowingly created some problems. Studies have shown that a child’s success throughout their life is largely dependent on the structure of their childhood (Hofferth). Given that men’s taking a more proactive role in the home and in the lives of their children is a good thing, the way that it has been approached has been problematic because it has undermined the hierarchy of the home. Similar to a man’s need to be the provider is the need to be the protector of his home. In addition, a man is not the only one who craves a distinctive hierarchy in the home, so do the children. According to Dr. David Bjorklund and Dr. Anthony Pellegrini, children need a clear authority figure. Often times by approaching parenting as a team and as equals, the mother and father undermine each other’s authority (Bjorklund, Pellegrini). Furthermore, without a specific and defined role, the position of father has been diminished as unimportant. For generations men have been noted as head of the house, and hailed for that important position. However, without that distinct role to play, it begins to seem like they’re participation is unnecessary as their wife is obviously much better suited to caring for and developing relationship with a child. These personal misgivings in combination with the media reinforcing the idea that the father role is superfluous, are huge contributors to why more and more fatherlessness is becoming the social epidemic of the generation (Pompper). This is an important issue that needs to be addressed, because Fathers are vital to the family unit. In their article about the role of fathers in children’s development, Amanda Quesenberry M. Ed. , Michaelene M. Ostrosky Ph. D. , and Robert Corso Ph. D. , note â€Å"Fathers are critical members of the family system who influence their children and their families in unique ways† (Quesenberry, Ostrosky, Corso). The article states that even in today’s society, father’s hold a huge amount of influence over society, enough that their presence and involvement is necessary to not only the success of the family as a unit, but also to the individual children. However, since the importance of fathers and fatherhood has not been stressed, and in fact the opposite has been emphasized, approximately one out of every 3 children does not have an active father or father figure in their lives (Hofferth). Acceptance and affection from a father or father figure is vital to a child’s cognitive development, and recent statistics how that behavioral problems among children, adolescents, and young adults with no active father in their lives are far greater than those of children living with both a father and a mother (Quesenberry, Ostrosky, Corso), and also tend to deal with one or more of the following issues: personality and psychological adjustment problems, behavioral problems (includin g aggression towards people and animals, property destruction, deceitfulness, and theft), delinquency, and psychopathology (substance abuse, depression) (Rohner). The rate of violent crimes have gone up roughly 300% since the 1960’s, and of the juveniles who have been incarcerated for serious crimes 70% of them have been raised with no real father figure. In addition, 70% of all girls who become pregnant were raised without fathers (Lykken). These alarming numbers demonstrate the profound effect a father can have on the development, and therefore future of a child. The final issue that has come out of male’s displacement from his traditional roles is a generation with no respect for authority. Teachers are having increasing difficulties with classroom control. Students no longer have it ingrained in them to respect their elders, and as a result don’t care what the teacher or the principal say. Because school is no longer a priority to students like this, the drop out rate has increased significantly, with just over half of all dropouts being fatherless (Lykken). In today’s economy, it is next to impossible to find a job without at least a high school diploma, and employers no longer have to put up with any employee who cannot do what they are told, because there is someone who would be happy to take their place who most likely has more experience or education and can do what they are told. To conclude, while equal opportunity is beneficial and has helped to move our society forward, it has also drastically changed the traditional male role. And while some of these changes are good ones, they unfortunately have had negative effects due to people’s ignorance of the possible consequences. For example, it is good that women have been able to pursue their goals and passions in the workforce, and it is good that men are able to help out more at home. However, what is not good is that men have become completely displaced from many of the roles that, to them, define them as men. The way their roles have changed has slowly and subconsciously emasculated and caused them to doubt their importance and purpose in the family unit, which in turn has led to a growing number of fatherless children, increased crime rate, and a lack of respect for any kind of authority. Works Cited Bjorklund, David F, and Anthony D. Pellegrini. â€Å"Child Development and Evolutionary Psychology. † Child Development. 71. 6 (2000): 1687-708. Print. 05 Mar. 2012 Hofferth, Sandra L. â€Å"Residential Father Family Type and Child Well-Being: Investment Versus Selection. † Demography. 43. 1 (2006): 53-77. Print. 03 Mar. 2012. Pompper, Donnalyn. Masculinities, the Metrosexual, and Media Images: Across Dimensions of Age and Ethnicity. † Sex Roles. 63 (2010): 9-10. Print. 05 Mar. 2012. Quesenberry, Amanda, Michaelene Ostrosky, and Robert Corso. â€Å"Skilled and Knowledgeable Caregivers: the Role of Fathers in Supporting Young Children’s Development. † Young E xceptional Children. 10. 4 (2007): 11-19. Print. 05 Mar. 2012. Rohner, Ronald P. â€Å"Father Love and Child Development: History and Current Evidence. † Current Directions in Psychological Science. 7. 5 (1998): 157-161. Print. 03 Mar. 2012. Rosin, Hanna. â€Å"The End of Men. † July-Aug. 2010. The Atlantic. Web. 03 Mar. 2012. How to cite Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present, Papers Change in Male Role in the Home 1960-Present Free Essays Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present Traditionally the United States, along with the majority of the world has been a patriarchal society. The customary male role, specifically in relation to the home, has been the head of the household, the protector, and the provider. A male’s duty was unquestionably embodied in these three ideas, until the 1970’s. We will write a custom essay sample on Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present or any similar topic only for you Order Now The growing feminist movement of that time began to question and displace these roles as solely belonging to a man, and the male role in society slowly began to shift. Instead of being the sole breadwinner for his home, families with two working parents have become increasingly more common. Women in the workforce have allowed father’s to spend more time at home with their children and helping out around the house. Over the last 50 years the male role has changed drastically, and while not all of the changes that have taken place are bad, the overall effect of these changes on society has been a negative one, creating a generation of fatherlessness, increased crime, and a general lack of respect for authority in any form. For generations it has been a man’s responsibility to provide for his family. Women were rarely even accepted into the workforce until after WWII. However, government encouragement for women to enter the labor force during the war, in combination with the rising feminist movement started a tidal wave movement of women pursuing higher education and careers. Women currently make up the majority of the workforce and 60% of all college graduates (Rosin). Donnalyn Pompper, a professor at Temple University, expands on this further in her article about the masculine gender role conflict theory. She explains that that after WWII, the increased female presence in the labor force â€Å"destabilized the breadwinner role as a basis for male identity, and now men must accept working wives and a more active parental role† (Pompper). And while it is true that the shift to equal opportunity in the workforce is almost universally agreed upon as a positive change, the balance and delicateness of the male psyche and ego are seldom taken into consideration. For many men, the ability to provide for one’s family is an integral part of the definition of masculinity. In interviews conducted by Dr. Pompper, when asked to individually define masculinity, a reoccurring theme in both the younger and older men interviewed was the ability to provide for one’s family. One of the young men interviewed said, â€Å"Being masculine means you are able to look at your wife and say ‘I got this’. To be able to look at your kids and say ‘I’ve got you’. That to me is the epitome of masculinity†¦being able, at the end of the day, to look at your family and say, ‘get on my back, I’ve got you the rest of the way’. Another man expressed similar feelings and said, â€Å"I think that every guy feels like it’s his place not to be the stay home Dad† (Pompper). Even in today’s forward thinking society, men are wired to be the provider. To take that role completely away is emasculating to him and leaves him feeling like he is unnecessary in the home. Although a family where, either both parents, or just the mother provide financially may be a little tough on the male ego, it is not detrimental. Provider is not the only established male role, protector and ‘head of the house’ are equally important to the equation. The traditional man of the 1960’s was indisputably the head of his home. There was a clear hierarchy, and while the husband and wife still often worked as a team, the culture of the time dictated that a man was undeniably in charge of his home, and his family. In many ways, this has been one of the most distinct changes between the 1960’s and 2012. Because men are no longer the sole breadwinner for their home, they are required to spend a larger portion of their time taking an active role in the home. No longer is the kitchen and house exclusively a woman’s domain, but rather shared by both parties. Men are expected to help out around the house and with the children, as much as women are. The idea of â€Å"team parenting† has evolved and taken root in today’s society, and has had excellent outcomes. Research has shown that children who are raised by two parents (a mother and a father specifically) have greater cognitive ability and success rates than children whose fathers are absent or uninvolved (Hofferth). This style of parents working together as a team to raise their children has been a great strategy, but looking at the big picture, it is shown that â€Å"Team parenting† has also unknowingly created some problems. Studies have shown that a child’s success throughout their life is largely dependent on the structure of their childhood (Hofferth). Given that men’s taking a more proactive role in the home and in the lives of their children is a good thing, the way that it has been approached has been problematic because it has undermined the hierarchy of the home. Similar to a man’s need to be the provider is the need to be the protector of his home. In addition, a man is not the only one who craves a distinctive hierarchy in the home, so do the children. According to Dr. David Bjorklund and Dr. Anthony Pellegrini, children need a clear authority figure. Often times by approaching parenting as a team and as equals, the mother and father undermine each other’s authority (Bjorklund, Pellegrini). Furthermore, without a specific and defined role, the position of father has been diminished as unimportant. For generations men have been noted as head of the house, and hailed for that important position. However, without that distinct role to play, it begins to seem like they’re participation is unnecessary as their wife is obviously much better suited to caring for and developing relationship with a child. These personal misgivings in combination with the media reinforcing the idea that the father role is superfluous, are huge contributors to why more and more fatherlessness is becoming the social epidemic of the generation (Pompper). This is an important issue that needs to be addressed, because Fathers are vital to the family unit. In their article about the role of fathers in children’s development, Amanda Quesenberry M. Ed. , Michaelene M. Ostrosky Ph. D. , and Robert Corso Ph. D. , note â€Å"Fathers are critical members of the family system who influence their children and their families in unique ways† (Quesenberry, Ostrosky, Corso). The article states that even in today’s society, father’s hold a huge amount of influence over society, enough that their presence and involvement is necessary to not only the success of the family as a unit, but also to the individual children. However, since the importance of fathers and fatherhood has not been stressed, and in fact the opposite has been emphasized, approximately one out of every 3 children does not have an active father or father figure in their lives (Hofferth). Acceptance and affection from a father or father figure is vital to a child’s cognitive development, and recent statistics how that behavioral problems among children, adolescents, and young adults with no active father in their lives are far greater than those of children living with both a father and a mother (Quesenberry, Ostrosky, Corso), and also tend to deal with one or more of the following issues: personality and psychological adjustment problems, behavioral problems (includin g aggression towards people and animals, property destruction, deceitfulness, and theft), delinquency, and psychopathology (substance abuse, depression) (Rohner). The rate of violent crimes have gone up roughly 300% since the 1960’s, and of the juveniles who have been incarcerated for serious crimes 70% of them have been raised with no real father figure. In addition, 70% of all girls who become pregnant were raised without fathers (Lykken). These alarming numbers demonstrate the profound effect a father can have on the development, and therefore future of a child. The final issue that has come out of male’s displacement from his traditional roles is a generation with no respect for authority. Teachers are having increasing difficulties with classroom control. Students no longer have it ingrained in them to respect their elders, and as a result don’t care what the teacher or the principal say. Because school is no longer a priority to students like this, the drop out rate has increased significantly, with just over half of all dropouts being fatherless (Lykken). In today’s economy, it is next to impossible to find a job without at least a high school diploma, and employers no longer have to put up with any employee who cannot do what they are told, because there is someone who would be happy to take their place who most likely has more experience or education and can do what they are told. To conclude, while equal opportunity is beneficial and has helped to move our society forward, it has also drastically changed the traditional male role. And while some of these changes are good ones, they unfortunately have had negative effects due to people’s ignorance of the possible consequences. For example, it is good that women have been able to pursue their goals and passions in the workforce, and it is good that men are able to help out more at home. However, what is not good is that men have become completely displaced from many of the roles that, to them, define them as men. The way their roles have changed has slowly and subconsciously emasculated and caused them to doubt their importance and purpose in the family unit, which in turn has led to a growing number of fatherless children, increased crime rate, and a lack of respect for any kind of authority. Works Cited Bjorklund, David F, and Anthony D. Pellegrini. â€Å"Child Development and Evolutionary Psychology. † Child Development. 71. 6 (2000): 1687-708. Print. 05 Mar. 2012 Hofferth, Sandra L. â€Å"Residential Father Family Type and Child Well-Being: Investment Versus Selection. † Demography. 43. 1 (2006): 53-77. Print. 03 Mar. 2012. Pompper, Donnalyn. Masculinities, the Metrosexual, and Media Images: Across Dimensions of Age and Ethnicity. † Sex Roles. 63 (2010): 9-10. Print. 05 Mar. 2012. Quesenberry, Amanda, Michaelene Ostrosky, and Robert Corso. â€Å"Skilled and Knowledgeable Caregivers: the Role of Fathers in Supporting Young Children’s Development. † Young E xceptional Children. 10. 4 (2007): 11-19. Print. 05 Mar. 2012. Rohner, Ronald P. â€Å"Father Love and Child Development: History and Current Evidence. † Current Directions in Psychological Science. 7. 5 (1998): 157-161. Print. 03 Mar. 2012. Rosin, Hanna. â€Å"The End of Men. † July-Aug. 2010. The Atlantic. Web. 03 Mar. 2012. How to cite Change in Male Role in the Home: 1960-Present, Essay examples

Rh Law free essay sample

Reproductive Health Bill was introduced by Congresswoman Bellaflor J. Angara -Castillo is also known as ? Reproductive Health Care Act of 2002? ,assembled at Senateand House of Representatives of the Philippines, and now known as House Bill 5043 of 2008. It ¶s been years since the bill was approved in the senate, due to some churchconflicts, biomedical ethical issues and some scientific research conflicts. Today thereare still lots of Filipino citizen who are now fully aware about this bill and why this billwas imposed. Before I write this reaction paper I had to read the Bill twice and read somearticles, reaction and comments in the internet I had read books and research which isrelated to reproductive health, sex education and Bioethics, for me to fully understandwhat was the RH bill all about and the reason of the creation of this bill. Poverty, the main problems that the Philippine is facing today and they say thatthe primary factors that lead to poverty is due to overpopulation, the Philippines has apopulation of 64,318,120 in 1990. Today the population is ballooning and estimated toover 94 million according to latest census and the top 12 th country having the mostpopulation. The population is growing by about 2 percent a year, giving the Philippinesone of the world ¶s highest population-growth rates. This is one of the reasons of the creation of the Reproductive Health bill to give asolution to poverty by eradicating the overpopulation problem, by implementing familyplanning, sex education and prevent the sexually transmitted disease. My Reaction Paper RH bill (Short) Add To Collection lecee Mae R. Mamaril B-216 The  Reproductive Health Bill, popularly known as the  RH Bill, is a Philippine bill promoting information on and access to both natural and modern family planning methods. The first time the Reproductive Health Bill was proposed was in 1998. During the present 15th Congress, the RH Bills filed are those authored by six members of the House of Representatives, and Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago of the Senate. On January 31, 2011, these bills were consolidated into a single RH Bill which was then unanimously approved for plenary debate by the House Committee on Population and Family Relations. One of the main concerns of the bill is that the population of the Philippines makes it â€Å"the 12th most populous nation in the world today†, that the Filipino women’s fertility rate is â€Å"at the upper bracket of 206 countries. † It states that studies and surveys show â€Å"that the Filipinos are responsive to having smaller-sized families through free choice of family planning methods. † It also refers to studies which â€Å"show that rapid population growth exacerbates poverty while poverty spawns rapid population growth. † And so it aims for improved quality of life through a â€Å"consistent and coherent national population policy. RH bill constitutes the information and access to natural and modern family planning, maternal, infant and child health and  nutrition, promotion of breast feeding, prevention of abortion and management of post-abortion complications , adolescent and youth health, prevention and management of reproductive tr act infections, such as HIV/AIDS and STDs, elimination of violence against women, counselling on sexuality and sexual and reproductive health, treatment of breast and reproductive tract cancers , male involvement and participation in RH, prevention and treatment of infertility and , RH education for the youth. And basically, it introduces the use of contraceptives. The term contraceptive denotes anything that is intended to [continues] NOT anti-God. On my part, I stand by the pro-RH faction. The Reproductive Health Bill is an important step towards the improvement of the quality of life of every Reproductive Health Bill When I hear the RH Bill, What comes to my mind? I must say that I am in favor to this law in the Philippines . This law means having control of the growing population in the Philipines and this will lessen poverty due to the lesser family members. The law states that the people has choices to pick in starting a family like contraceptives, condoms, pills, IUD. This Bill will help people much especially the uneducated ones to know more information about family planning, prevention of abortion, sex education, prevention of HIV/AIDS and others. The poorest family may have the biggest family, now is the time for them to give education about controlling by approving this bill. I think this bill was aimed to the poor ones because they are the ones who cannot support their family and most of them has no education, this means more problem. This helps us to make the lives of the filipino future to be more productive. We are already in a modern world, many of the people know about sex. Even out of wed lock have sex, even friends have sex but the bill helps to control having birth and being safe. Most especially teens, they are the one mostly who are engaging in sex. By giving them proper explanation by their parents to be responsible and do what is right, do you think that their children will listen? Well, it’s up to them but parents should always be reminding their children to do what is wrong from right. Why do others are against it? Maybe because it’s also against the Roman Catholic Church and the beliefs of other groups. But people has their own right what they will do and what they want to believe and use.